Petition to Grant new trial for Thomas “Nat” Allen
Insurmountable evidence of Legal Injustice..
In March 2006, Thomas “Nat” Allen, of Morristown, TN, was convicted of murder and sentenced to Life in prison, despite there being no physical evidence linking Thomas to the crime, only 2nd party hearsay testimony from admitted drug addicts, all of whom were incarcerated or facing jail time, at the time.
Along with there being no physical evidence against Thomas, there was also an insurmountable amount of errors in the trial, including several jury members being allowed to participate despite having personal history with Thomas. Another major issue is that the presiding Judge, had extremely personal history with Nat’s deceased grandmother, and mentioned it several times throughout the trial.
There are too many technical errors to list here, but the bottom line is that Nat Allen deserves and is legally entitled to a new trial, a proper trial he should have been given in the first place. Thomas continues to profess his innocence. He has continually been denied a new trial, despite all these errors. Please grant Thomas “Nat” Allen a new trial.
Thomas Nathaniel “Nat” Allen, a 34 year old proud father of 3; two girls and finally a boy. He was born and raised in Morristown Tennessee and everyone that knows him, knows he is a good, kind-hearted person who would give you his last dime if you needed it.
Before this invasive interruption in his life, Thomas worked for a living managing his own concrete company, inherited from his father, Tom’s Concrete.
He loved spending time with his 3 children, and his family & friends. He is an avid golfer and has won many golf tournaments.
Tweet This
Digg This
Save to delicious
Stumble it
RSS Feed
1 Comments
[...] Petition to Grant new trial for Thomas “Nat” Allen Legal InjusticeNovember 3, 2011 [...]
[...] Petition to Grant new trial for Thomas “Nat” Allen Legal InjusticeNovember 3, 2011 0 [...]
on petition for Thomas(nat)Allen,only 1 black jurer,he knew allen well,been to his house,other jurer waddell had also been to allens house,waddells neice was married to allens friend,and knew allen well.jurer waddell lied on jurer form,said he didnt know allen,also waddells daughter worked at the place of allens trial(hamblem co.,tenn.head of jury should have read jurer forms more carefull,the so called informant (don wilder)was a known drug addict,and was used by the law to snitch or tell lies on people just to stay out of jail,ask anyony who knew him and half of morristown will say this is true.